The Results
I keep a personal rule: never state a number I can't define and defend. Here are the ones I claim — expand each for its exact meaning, its limits, and how it was verified.
4.93 million medical encounters
What it means: 4,934,493 in-scope operational events — provider visits (3,914,446), pharmacy dispensing encounters (563,606), and laboratory/clinical investigations (456,441) — indexed in the platform's validated central warehouse, covering 2014 through January 2026.
What it doesn't mean: not unique patients (identity spans systems and funders; I deliberately never claim a patient count), and not "records" in the vague marketing sense — these are defined, countable events.
Verified how: by a profiling run (v1.1, June 2026) that counted directly against the production databases. Full governance page →
99.999% verified source traceability
What it means: of those 4,934,493 events, 4,934,458 were machine-verified to resolve back to the exact originating row in the registered source table — a check most systems can't even attempt, because it requires lineage designed in from day one. The 35 that failed are documented exceptions.
What it doesn't mean: not that the data is perfect — quality exceptions exist and are catalogued (that's the point of governance).
Verified how: automated source-verification pass, June 2026. See the mechanism, with diagram →
6.67 million linked treatment / service items
What it means: 6,672,438 billed service and treatment line items linked to their provider encounters; 97.98% of provider encounters carry line-item detail.
What it doesn't mean: not currency amounts or claims paid — these are operational line items.
Hundreds of subscribing organizations, renewing 10+ years
What it means: offices, pharmacies, laboratories, and insurers subscribed to the platform and paid, year after year, for over a decade — through economic conditions that punished any software that failed.
What it doesn't mean: not enterprise Fortune-500 logos. Small organizations with unforgiving budgets — which is a harder retention test, not an easier one.
Verified how: the business ran ~14 years and was sold in 2026 as a going concern with its customer base — the buyer's diligence is its own verification. The exit →
1,000+ users trained
What it means: receptionists, clerks, pharmacy staff, lab technicians, administrators, and managers, trained personally across hundreds of deployments, with the guides and materials written by me.
What it doesn't mean: not webinar attendees — hands-on, at-the-desk training tied to go-lives.
5,000+ verified service points in the network
What it means: the verified healthcare service-point network reachable through the platform's exchange and payment services at its peak scope.
What it doesn't mean: not 5,000 direct software installations — network reach and installed base are different numbers, and I keep them separate.